Discussion about this post

User's avatar
john's avatar

You are arguing for your own character all the while complaining of the past that brought you to this point. This sounds like some angsty teen bullshit about your own choices or frustration at your parent’s expectations. Either way a bunch of sour grapes about your station in life before you clawed your way out. Good on you for climbing out of it, seems to me like you’ve done pretty well for yourself, but nobody owes you anything. How are the powers that be to even know you exist? The unalloyed egotism that it takes to say “Why don’t they see the glory that is me?” is some spectacular narcissistic navel gazing. This line of thought is at best myopic and shortsighted. Because you got some good grades in high school and college? A dime a dozen. You volunteered at church and charities? Darn common among the striving. The biblical curse exists as an admonition to all men, not just the losers or those who lack ambition. Your menial labor history has certainly proven effective in galvanizing your mind as to what you don’t want to do and can be considered valuable in that respect alone. As hard as it may be, writing articles for a living while pursuing a doctorate strikes one as pretty cushy gig on the whole. The most frustrating part of this screed is how you seem to lack gratitude for how much you have benefited from the extant system. As much as there are problems with the current paradigm, the ancien regime will gladly be “vampiric” of ambition and intelligence as easily as it will be of a strong back.

Expand full comment
Warburton Expat's avatar

I think the issue here is that you, like most of the modern Anglosphere, are confusing your work with your job.

Your work is the thing which you feel makes the best use of your creative and productive powers. Your job is the thing which earns you money. You need work for your soul, and you need a job for material goods and services.

If you are lucky, or educated, or have chosen well, then your work and job may be the same. But it won't always be so. For example, a man's work may be to be husband and father, while his job is cleaning public toilets. If he has no wife and children to give him work, then his job cleaning public toilets will be nothing but a grinding misery to him. But if he has a wife and children, then his job cleaning public toilets will still often be unpleasant or dull, but it will have meaning for him.

In the modern Anglosphere, many people lead atomised, alienated lives. They spend many years in education seeking the highest-paying and most prestigious job possible. They thus never find their work.

If you have no work, only a job, it is natural to resent your job for being unpleasant, dull, and not paying you enough.

If you have merely a job, then that job being hard is an imposition on you, pointless drudgery and misery. But if you have work, then you can pass many hours doing it. You will count your hours at your job, and give it your minimum efforts. You will not count your hours at your work, and will give it your all.

It need not be so. There's an authour who realised that his IT job was something taking him physically away from the work of his wife and children, and the work he wanted to do on the land, and it was also a set of skills which he couldn't pass on to his children. He looked into what he called the "durable trades", work which has existed for centuries and is likely to exist for centuries more, which could be done at or close to home, and which could be passed on from parent to child.

His book has an introduction with something of a polemic against homosexuality and abortion, which you may or may not agree with, but is really irrelevant to the rest of the book - I suppose as a North American conservative Christian he felt obliged to toss it in there. But you can flip over that bit, and read the rest, and I think you'll get something out of it.

https://www.thegrovestead.com/durabletrades/

Expand full comment
66 more comments...

No posts